On her live show last night, Candace Owens called out Superfeed Technologies and TPAction CEO Tyler Bowyer saying: “I knew Tyler Bowyer was lying when he tweeted this guy was commanded by the police to take down the cameras.” she went on to note: “The camera guy (Terryl Farnsworth), he too was also brought into the company by Tyler Bowyer.” The camera man announced immediately “He’s dead.” in less than a minute while filming a selfie of himself. “Everything Turning Point is doing is wrong.”
Clip: Tyler Bowyer is Lying per Candace Owens on TPUSA Camera Removals from Crime Scene
Clip: TPUSA Cameraman Terryl Farnsworth Who Removed Camera From Crime Scene Films Self Declares Charlie Kirk Dead 1 Minute Afterward
See the below video posted by @MJTruthUltra.
Video of TPUSA Employee Terryl Farnsworth Removing Overhead Camera 5 Minutes after Charlie Kirk Was Shot
Tyler Bowyer publicly claimed the TPUSA Cameramen were ordered by police to remove the SD Cards/Footage from the Cameras:
Police Protocols Strictly Require Preserving Video Evidence and Chain of Custody to Prevent Tampering
According to Grok Tyler Bowyer is lying when he claims that police told them to remove the SD cards/footage: “No, police protocols strictly require preserving video evidence to maintain chain of custody and prevent tampering. Officers secure cameras or footage themselves, often via warrants or requests, rather than directing civilians to remove SD cards. Such an instruction would undermine investigations and invite legal challenges, making it highly implausible in standard procedure.”
Tyler Bowyer Accused of Alleged Wrong Doing Multiple Times
A poll conducted in April of 2025 revealed nearly 88% of respondents believe Tyler Bowyer should have been fired by Charlie Kirk.
Excerpts from the Police Report
The below excerpts from the police report detail some items of the alleged sexual assault. In typical abuser fashion, the alleged assaulter blames the victim, despite many other details confirming the Victim’s version of events. One key point is that both interviews involve the Victim saying to the Alleged assaulter to “get the f/fuck out of my car”. Does that make sense if the Victim was to blame? Matthew also claims that he “could not answer” certain questions about what happened and “tried to remove a lot of that day from my mind”. Please see the excerpts below:
Turning Point Action Response to Allegations Highlighted in this Story to the Author through General Counsel in Threatening Letter
Chief Operating Officer Tyler Bowyer Inappropriately Takes Over the HR Investigation
According to the Victim and corroborated by additional evidence and interviews, COO Tyler Bowyer inappropriately took over the interview from the HR Department. According to one former Turning Point employee, who spoke on the condition of anonymity in fear of retaliation, “Bowyer has a history of being dismissive of women and has had allegations of sexual assault made against himself in the past as well.” and that Bowyer instructed the Victim to “Show Matthew around” and said of this alleged sexual assault case towards the Victim: “It wasn’t that bad and she should just forget it.” and by two accounts, “That Bowyer scheduled Matthew and the Victim to be alone in the office after the (alleged) assault.” If Matthew’s account was correct and the Victim was to blame, why would Bowyer do that when an investigation of sexual assault had been opened?
Responding to an email sent from “Amy” in Turning Point Action Human Relations, Bowyer responds he is moving the date of the HR meeting. According to the Victim “Tyler was leading the investigation and the interview. Essentially I was just meeting with Tyler. It was him just raking me over the coals and asking questions because they had spoken to Matthew first.”
We have already covered that Bowyer and the alleged assaulter Martinez were friends. According to an interview with the Victim, “Tyler and Matthew would post pictures together at dinner. They would hang out together, they frequently travelled together and had beers together down the street from the hotel.”
Mr. Carni again responds rather hostilely saying “The assertion that Tyler Bowyer participated in a cover-up is patently false and this further underscores your lack of journalistic integrity. Mr. Bowyer neither silenced anyone nor concealed any piece of the evidence presented. Both parties were given numerous opportunities to be heard, submit information for Turning Point Action HR and leadership to consider and supplement previous statements. All submitted information, statements and evidence were considered in Turning Point Action’s HR investigation and resolution of the matter.” and further “First, Turning Point Action has never received a sexual assault allegation against Mr. Bowyer.” and “Again, this is false. The Claimant and Mr. Martinez were never “scheduled” to be alone in the office together. And, in fact, never again were they in the office alone together after the initiation of the investigation. Turning Point Action leadership made multiple directives and accommodations to ensure the comfortability of both parties a neutral investigation was underway. Even after completing the investigation, Turning Point Action reiterated directives to both parties regarding their separation in the office and offered the Claimant specific and unique accommodations post-investigation.”
Turning Point Legal Counsel Sends Intimidation Threat to Victim With No Basis in Law
On April 9th, 2024, Veronica Peterson identifying herself as “Counsel for Turning Point Action” sent an intimidation threat to the victim noting, “upon your commencement of employment with TPA, you signed an Employee Confidentiality and Proprietary Rights Agreement (“NDA”)” and “TPA has been informed that you are actively discussing a confidential investigation that arose from your report of (sexual) harassment by a coworker.” It is interesting that Counsel for Turning Point Action chose to improperly downplay allegations of sexual assault as both the alleged Abuser and Victim specifically mention it as in the police report as simply “harassment”. Peterson goes on to say, “you would be in violation of your NDA and you must cease continuing such communications” and “TPA takes this matter very seriously and is prepared to take appropriate legal action for any continued documented violations of your NDA.”
The problem? These Threats have NO LEGAL BASIS. Legal Precedent is Clear:
“That NDAs are invalid when it comes to sexual assault: Federal Precedent and Legislation Speak Out Act (2022) Citation: Pub. L. No. 117-224, 136 Stat. 2277 (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 19401 et seq.) Overview: Signed into law on December 7, 2022, the Speak Out Act renders pre-dispute NDAs unenforceable in cases involving sexual assault or sexual harassment. This federal law prohibits employers from enforcing NDAs signed before a dispute arises (e.g., as part of an employment contract) that would prevent victims from discussing sexual assault or harassment allegations. It applies retroactively to existing NDAs and took effect immediately upon enactment. Significance: This statute establishes a clear public policy exception, prioritizing victims’ ability to speak out over contractual confidentiality obligations.
Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act (2022) Citation: Pub. L. No. 117-90, 136 Stat. 26 (codified at 9 U.S.C. §§ 401-402) Overview: Enacted on March 3, 2022, this law allows victims of sexual assault or harassment to opt out of pre-dispute arbitration agreements, which are often paired with NDAs in employment contracts. While not directly targeting NDAs, it undermines their enforceability by ensuring victims can pursue claims in open court, where confidentiality clauses may be challenged. Significance: By giving victims access to public judicial proceedings, this act indirectly weakens NDAs that might otherwise suppress disclosure of sexual assault allegations.
EEOC v. Phoenix Transit System (2000) Citation: NLRB Case 28-CA-15177 (National Labor Relations Board decision, referenced in broader labor law context) Overview: In this case, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) found that an employer’s confidentiality rule, akin to an NDA, violated Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) by prohibiting employees from discussing sexual harassment complaints among themselves. While not a direct court precedent, this administrative ruling has been influential in labor law. Significance: The decision suggests that NDAs restricting employees’ rights to discuss workplace sexual misconduct, including assault, may be unenforceable if they infringe on protected concerted activity under federal labor law.”
Turning Point Action and Bowyer also attempted to dismiss the sexual assault and harassment by insinuating “It took place outside of the office and off hours.” According to multiple former Turning Point Action employees, it is very common to work weekends and off hours. Martinez, who the Victim stated she had worked with as a subordinate, “had asked me if I might show him around a little bit, but I was tired and busy, so I declined. The next day, Matthew asked me if I would drive him to a meeting. He didn’t have a car, so I thought I was being helpful. He told me to expense my mileage because it was for work and that Tyler had approved it.”
Again the Legal Precedent is Clear:
“When it comes to workplace sexual harassment occurring outside the office, U.S. courts have established that liability can still apply under certain conditions, rooted in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits sex-based discrimination, including harassment, in employment. The key question is whether the incident is sufficiently connected to the work environment or employment relationship, even if it happens off-site or after hours. Here’s a breakdown based on legal precedent: Employer Liability for Off-Site Conduct: Courts have ruled that employers can be held liable for harassment occurring outside the workplace if it involves coworkers or supervisors and impacts the work environment. For example, in Ferris v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. (2d Cir. 2002), the court found that an employer could be liable for a supervisor’s off-duty assault of an employee during a layover, as it stemmed from their work relationship. The reasoning hinges on whether the conduct “alters the conditions of the victim’s employment” (Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc., 510 U.S. 17, 1993). Work-Related Events: Incidents at company-sponsored events—like holiday parties or retreats—often fall under employer responsibility. In Ocheltree v. Scollon Productions, Inc. (4th Cir. 2003), harassment at an off-site company event was deemed actionable because it was an extension of the workplace.”
Sexual Assault and Misconduct at Events Allegation: TPUSA failed to address sexual assault and harassment at its events, creating an unsafe environment. Evidence: Washington Examiner reported in 2018 that former staffers knew of “two or three” assault allegations since 2012, often in TPUSA-funded hotel rooms during summits (e.g., 2017 Student Action Summit). Witnesses described inadequate supervision and unreported incidents. Source: Schoffstall, Joe. “Turning Point USA Struggles with Allegations of Student Sexual Assault, Harassment.” Washington Examiner, June 19, 2018. washingtonexaminer.com/news/turning-p Note: TPUSA cited privacy concerns and claimed adherence to protocol but didn’t confirm specific actions.
Negligence in Handling Sexual Assault Allegations at TPUSA Events (2017) Allegation: Bowyer, as COO of Turning Point USA (TPUSA) in 2017, was accused of dismissing requests for increased security at events, contributing to incidents of sexual assault and harassment. Evidence: A Washington Examiner investigation in June 2018 detailed allegations from staffers at TPUSA’s 2017 Student Action Summit. One female staffer reported a college student waking up to a male attendee “groping her and shoving his hands down her pants” after a night of heavy drinking. Staffers claimed they approached Bowyer for additional security (e.g., hiring deputies), but he allegedly responded, “It just wasn’t worth it” and deferred action until “something happens.” Similar incidents were reported at other TPUSA-sponsored events, including the 2017 Road to Majority Conference, though Bowyer was not directly quoted in those instances. Context and Credibility: The allegations come from firsthand accounts of former TPUSA staff, published by a reputable conservative-leaning outlet, lending some credibility. However, TPUSA denied Bowyer rejected security requests, citing existing Secret Service and private security presence at the Summit. No legal action followed, and the claims remain unproven in court. The lack of corroborating legal or documentary evidence (e.g., police reports) weakens the allegation’s weight compared to the fake elector case, but it reflects poorly on TPUSA’s management under Bowyer. Significance: This suggests potential negligence in ensuring attendee safety, though it lacks the concrete legal backing of other allegations.
A Call to Other Victims to Come Forward Amidst A Developing Pattern of Behavior, Permissive Culture, and Cover-up of Sexual Assaults
All other victims are called upon to come forward with their stories against what appears to be a developing pattern of behavior, permissive culture, and cover-up of sexual assaults. Turning Point Action is called upon to immediately conduct proper investigations without baseless legal threats and intimidation against victims, and take corrective action including intensive sexual harassment and safe environment training of all employees and related organizations and to investigate and take appropriate actions as investigations and up to and including dismissal of any and all employees involved in sexual assaults or cover-ups.
Turning Point PAC Wisconsin Financials $121K+ Contributions Supporting Allegations of Bribery & Coup
The show also discussed discrepancies between Pastor Rob McCoy saying his son and TPUSA Chief of Staff Mikey McCoy was a hero and falsely stating he “had blood all over him” (Immediately following his son’s name). Camera footage clearly showed that was not the case and was impossible. Mikey McCoy was criticized for nearly instantly walking away after his boss Charlie Kirk was shot. See the video thanks to @BasedSamParker below:
Pastor Rob McCoy Video:
As always, Tyler Bowyer and Turning Point refused any public request for comment.